Looks like one of the white knights of the left is riding in on an extremely high horse to defend the poor simple indigenous folx. Bravo.
I'm so glad you were able to police my other comments too, they're also wrong but you're incapable of addressing them so you just decree with no evidence rquired that they make me "MAGA-adjacent" and therefore a bad person. Apparently it's fine to have grievance rhetoric against governments except when the corrupt warmongers happen to be the secular high priests of your religion. This is so great! I'm sorry for all the violent hate speech that offended you so, my liege.
He’s simply asking you to unsarcastically state what your position and movement actually are, instead of hiding behind ironic edgelording, performative grievance theatrics, and a Heisenbergian fog in which, by design, measuring one makes the other conveniently unknowable -- and everything remains safely entangled.
You don't need to ask him to explain how he observed you, you're the only one who knows what you really mean.
It's time for the Festivus Feats of Strength. Ball's in your court, Georgie!
Your surprised and bewildered questions -- that clearly proved you couldn't comprehend that cess11 was mocking you -- weren't addressed to me, they were addressed to cess11, but I generously ELI5'ed them for you anyway.
You just didn't like the answers, so now you're so flustered and confused that you wrongly accuse me of not answering, since you're still unable to explain what you mean. You don't even know! Now THAT is truly unhinged.
Then, when the ball was in your court, you dropped it again, Georgie!
As a crybaby histrionically claiming persecution from "violent unsanctioned speech" when complemented on your sick casual racism, it's pretty rich to hear you accuse me of being unhinged for merely answering your questions and asking you to explain what you mean.
It was predictably easy to shut you down by simply asking you to explain what you mean, because you lack any meaning at all. Now take cess11's sagely advice and stop trying to engage in conversation.
Read the entire sentence, nitwit. You couldn't make it past the first word without making a totally humiliating elementary schoolboy mistake, then trying to blame it on me. Your incorrect correction "You are surprised and bewildered questions" doesn't even make grammatical or semantic sense.
Let me spell it out simply enough that the tokens all fit in your tiny cramped sliding context window and tired lonely little attention head, by omitting the parenthetical text offset between "--".
I wrote "Your surprised and bewildered questions [...] weren't addressed to me," which IS grammatically and factually correct: YOUR questions. The questions you asked. That belong to you. The surprised and bewildered ones. They were not addressed to me.
I am in no way obligated to even attempt answering them, so stop being so angry and frustrated about not getting enough personal attention to your confused and bewildered cries for help.
You still fail to comprehend that he was mocking you, as I already patiently explained to you. And he is not going to answer your surprised and bewildered questions, because you don't deserve answers, and that would spoil the joke on you anyway, so leaving them unanswered makes it supremely funnier.
But the fact that you didn't realize he was mocking you, and then asked your self-absorbed deeply revealing questions, makes it 100x more hilarious that you unwittingly beclowned yourself and amplified his mockery to another epic level entirely.
And then to outdo your own epic self-own, now you're continuing to spectacularly humiliate yourself by misreading and getting tripped up on elementary school grammar, totally blowing it up in your own face, and making even more mendacious hostile accusations, instead of answering a simple question anyone with a coherent point would gladly and easily be able to.
Yet again you're unwittingly proving my point that you're incapable of answering this simple question: what is your point? Instead of proving mine yet again, just state yours for the first time ever.
Please explain to the class all the racist shit you said so we can all understand what you mean and where you're coming from.
Woah, you're (not your) really rattled after self-owning yourself like that so many times. All your (not you're) fury and spite turned back on you and bit you in the ass for all to see.
Not a boomer. Why do you have the mind of a boomer? Usually it's boomers who are the racist ones, yet you're but a sweet summer child. So explain what you meant by all that racist shit you said, and where you learned those idiotic outdated ideas. Or can you?
Going off the rails is you saying ridiculous racist shit, then throwing hysterical temper tantrums and calling names and making false accusations (not to mention hilariously trying incorrectly to correct grammar), but not even being able to explain your own words, then desperately and repeatedly trying to change the subject away from explaining what you wrote yourself. Any regrets writing your racist words that you still can't explain yet?
By the way, you're apparently unaware that you can simply substitute "you are" for "you're" to tell if you're using the right word. It's elementary level grammar, and if you can manage to remember it, then you'll never make the embarrassing mistake you just did again. I'm only pointing that out since you just proved you didn't know that, and you can really use some help with your grammar and anger issues, before making such an ass of yourself trying to correct other people when you're the one who's wrong. It works for other contraction/possessive pairs like who's/whose, too! Try it! Then practice! I've given you the tools, now the rest is up to you. You can thank me later. Good luck!
Ball's in your court again, Georgie. Try not to make such a spectacular fool of yourself this time by going off the rails to avoid answering the question. Just calmly explain your racist remarks so we can all understand what you mean.
I'm so glad you were able to police my other comments too, they're also wrong but you're incapable of addressing them so you just decree with no evidence rquired that they make me "MAGA-adjacent" and therefore a bad person. Apparently it's fine to have grievance rhetoric against governments except when the corrupt warmongers happen to be the secular high priests of your religion. This is so great! I'm sorry for all the violent hate speech that offended you so, my liege.