Have to keep in mind that what is happening now is basically what was promised decades ago. Never mind 4GL, 5GL, expert systems, and other efforts that went nowhere... even COBOL was created with the intention of making programming look more like natural language.
Often, revolutions take longer to happen than we think they will, and then they happen faster than we think they will. And when the tipping point is finally reached, we find more people pushing back than we thought there would be.
I believe high level languages will be replaced by natural human language, the same way as low level languages replaced by high level languages. It is the natural evolution of development.
On the other hand agentic teams will take over solo agents.
> I believe high level languages will be replaced by natural human languageI believe high level languages will be replaced by natural human language
Ask any human client buying dev work from a web agency how "natural language" spec works out for them.
It's not clear to me at all that "natural language" alone is ideal -- unless you also have near real time iteration of builds. If you do, then the build is a concrete manifestation of the spec, and the natural language can say "but that's not what I meant".
This allows messy natural language to vector towards the solution, "I'll know it when I see it" style.
So, natural language shaping iteratively convergent builds.
Things seem to be heading in the direction of using formal languages to define deterministic behaviour and natural languages to express matters of human taste.
I think it is actually going to happen verrrrry slowly. but it will happen. Many many of my colleagues are understandably resisting. it will take a long time to balance out.
Meh. What I’m doing with coding agents is what I’ve been doing for years: TDD except I use prose to describe what I want instead of writing every line of code and then spend more time in review/qa