Contrarily, the problem I have with non-materialist/physicalist explanations is that they don't really seem to explain anything.
If we assume dualism, that there is some non-material stuff -- call it soul or spirit or mind or psyche or whatever -- that gives rise to consciousness, I think it's fair to ask how it does that.
And if the answer is "we don't know" or "it just does", I really can't see what we've gained over materialism.
If we assume dualism, that there is some non-material stuff -- call it soul or spirit or mind or psyche or whatever -- that gives rise to consciousness, I think it's fair to ask how it does that.
And if the answer is "we don't know" or "it just does", I really can't see what we've gained over materialism.